SEC v. Harrisburg means greater responsibility for accountants, professor writes

November 04, 2013

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. -- Government-employed accountants must exercise greater care in the wake of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proceeding against the city of Harrisburg, according to J. Edward Ketz, associate professor of accounting at the Penn State Smeal College of Business.

The SEC’s action against Harrisburg has implications for county, city and state governments that extend beyond officially filed documents into publicly available statements and information.

In May, the SEC filed charges against the city for issuing fraudulent public statements. At the time, Harrisburg was near bankruptcy and Moody’s had downgraded its credit rating. After a two-year probe into the city’s financial disclosures, the SEC had found misleading information and omissions regarding the city’s financial position.

“What makes the case interesting is that the SEC examined assertions by city officials in documents other than SEC filings,” wrote Ketz in an article to be published in The CPA Journal.

According to Ketz, between 2009-11 the city of Harrisburg stopped supplying required financial statements to the SEC. In the absence of officially submitted documents, the SEC examined other publicly available information produced by the city, such as its 2009 budget, the state of the city address and a mid-year fiscal report -- all of which were publicly available on the city’s website.

“The SEC declared that these three items misstated the financial condition of the city by describing a rosier position than actually existed chiefly by not disclosing payments on guaranteed debt already made and likely to be made in the near future. The budget also misstated the credit rating by listing the better and no-longer-true rating,” said Ketz.

That the SEC took into account documents that were not official filings indicates that any and all public statements issued by governmental entities -- including accountants and controllers -- must be diligently examined for correctness and completeness. These documents include budgets, financial evaluations, mid-year assessments and public speeches.

“This expands the professional responsibilities of accountants, who must be careful not to issue misleading statements in these or similar documents. Legal liability may extend to them if the statements are found to be fraudulent,” said Ketz.

(Media Contacts)

Last Updated July 28, 2017