Research

Probing Question: Is time-out a good form of discipline for children?

mother talking to childFlickr user theloushe

Television's Supernanny calls it "sitting on the naughty step." Others prefer calling it "time-in." Some have dubbed it a bad idea altogether. Most parents have heard of—and tried—the time-out technique for correcting children's behavior. But is it a good technique to use?

It can be, says Linda Duerr. At Penn State's Child Development Laboratory, children take a breather from tense situations by snuggling in the sofas or loveseats found in every room, and Laboratory Director Duerr prefers to say the child is "going to the soft place." "When a child is out of control, it's hard for him to sit in a hard chair in a corner. Maybe he needs to punch the pillow or put his head on the soft arm of a sofa," she says.

This form of time-out can help children five and younger get calmed down so they can talk about their behavior. "When a child is not able to participate in activities and can't negotiate some conflict and gets really upset, then I think it's appropriate to say, let's take some time," Duerr says. Some people prefer to use the term "time with" rather than "time out" and Duerr thinks that's a good way to think about it. Especially for children five and under, she says, caregivers should stay with the child, or at least nearby, to offer comfort or even a hug, and to talk about what the child did wrong. "Sometimes a child needs to be held. Even if they have hit someone, they still need love too," Duerr says.

She warns that time-out shouldn't be used as a source of ridicule. If a child has a reputation of always being in time-out, then it's not working, Duerr says. "We're not going for embarrassment here. We're trying to help the child to be able to negotiate this problem, to regain some self-control. If time-out is used effectively, it shouldn't have to be used for the same children over and over again."

Also, make sure that a time-out doesn't last too long, reminds Duerr. Some people use a timer; Jo Frost, aka Supernanny, suggests one minute of time-out for every year of the child's age. Duerr doesn't think the minute count matters much, as long as you give the child just long enough to calm down.

Then it's time for the most important part, Duerr says: a conversation about what happened, and what the child can do differently next time. "We had this happen just this morning. I had to move a child a bit away from the dramatic play area and say, 'Come on, do you think if you had asked her nicely for the magic wand, maybe she would have given it to you? Did you listen? Did you hear that she was trying to tell you that when she was done, she would give it to you?' Don't just do a time-out, then say, 'Alright, you're done.' If you do it that way, there's no learning there."

Linda M. Duerr, M.Ed. is Director of the Child Development Laboratory and can be reached at lmd9@psu.edu.

Last Updated April 6, 2010