1/12/10Last May, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, which on its face appeared to be a case about national security issues. So why has the decision caused so much discussion among civil rights advocates? The decision means that certain kinds of lawsuits can be dismissed even before a plaintiff has the opportunity to access evidence to prove his or her claim. Civil rights advocates are especially worried that courts will use the case as an excuse to keep marginalized groups from being able to access the nation's courts.
On March 26, Penn State Law Review will hold a symposium titled "Reflections on Iqbal -- Discerning its Rule, Grappling With its Implications," comprised of three panels of academics and two members of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, addressing various aspects of the decision. In addition, Judge Lee H. Rosenthal, U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, and chair of the Judicial Conference Committee on the Rules of Practice and Procedure that advises the Supreme Court on its rules, will be the keynote speaker.